From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cichlid.ash.relay.mailchannels.net (cichlid.ash.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.222.36]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E25B3858D20 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2022 14:09:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 2E25B3858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gotplt.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gotplt.org X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|siddhesh@gotplt.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954F08632C6; Mon, 7 Feb 2022 14:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a305.dreamhost.com (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0CB9D863672; Mon, 7 Feb 2022 14:09:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|siddhesh@gotplt.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a305.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.126.0.25 (trex/6.4.3); Mon, 07 Feb 2022 14:09:39 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|siddhesh@gotplt.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Average-Arch: 33c6520b3ba35b02_1644242979452_2268180749 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1644242979452:2845588747 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1644242979451 Received: from [192.168.1.174] (unknown [1.186.224.172]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: siddhesh@gotplt.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a305.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Jsp1F4BytzZX; Mon, 7 Feb 2022 06:09:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gotplt.org; s=gotplt.org; t=1644242978; bh=9a2sOoi/RIo254jk78Js/6oJtis=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Dya08jEnJWwgKVOe2U3/9UwrK1CAuKdMxQHrI4O5LBlLkfEbV7qSds4VdgASJCqDE 3JQqhJRmXi0zNvOP3lRYcxQBjyZjGh+Fk/XN+V9l0YGM182Eiu9fNeRsVytxJkrBGm 0W9VuOIufH1kYLoGJBHImabGnTn7DUXQSY22JHvU= Message-ID: <5eaaf589-5573-00ca-2caa-777551bc6922@gotplt.org> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 19:39:32 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0 Subject: Re: Patchwork review workflow: archival rules Content-Language: en-US From: Siddhesh Poyarekar To: Carlos O'Donell , libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <5db890b1-f23c-22cc-407e-bf172dd24590@gotplt.org> <8238574b-be44-a25a-a5f3-118803d21fd2@redhat.com> <5001afa3-4c34-71d6-c70e-3629445da8e7@gotplt.org> In-Reply-To: <5001afa3-4c34-71d6-c70e-3629445da8e7@gotplt.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3031.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 14:09:47 -0000 On 30/11/2021 05:47, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On 11/30/21 03:50, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> On 11/15/21 23:22, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> What do people think about adding the following to the patch review >>> workflow[1]?  This should help keep the queue under control. >>> >>> ~~~~~~ >>> 3. Maintaining your patch queue >>> >>> 3.1 (existing content) >>> >>> 3.2. Outdated Patches >>> >>> To keep tha backlog in patchwork manageable, outdated patches may be >>> archived at regular intervals. >>> >>>   * Patches in Changes Requested status will be archived 1 year after >>> they have been posted >> >> >> Agreed. And we can decrease the "1 year after" if we find it helps >> keep the queue cleaner. >>>   * Patches older than 3 months that fail to apply to the current >>> main branch will be set to Rejected >> >> This will be an important step in keeping the queue clean. >> >> I agree with this move. >> >>>   * Unresolved patches older than 2 years will be archived. >> >> Agreed. >> >>> ~~~~~~ >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Siddhesh >>> >>> [1] https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Patch%20Review%20Workflow >> >> All of this looks good to me. >> >> We can change it any time we want IMO, so long as we set expectations and >> have a public discussion with our reason for making the change. > > Thanks, I'll make the change in the wiki and run some commands over the > weekend to implement this. Sorry I forgot about this; I've updated the wiki now and will run updates soon. Siddhesh