public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH COMMITTED] oc_FR locale: Fix spelling of April (bug 25639)
@ 2020-04-06 22:30 Rafal Luzynski
  2020-04-06 22:48 ` Rafal Luzynski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafal Luzynski @ 2020-04-06 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: libc-alpha; +Cc: quentinantonin

From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Lu=C5=BCy=C5=84ski?=
<digitalfreak@lingonborough.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 23:45:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] oc_FR locale: Fix spelling of April (bug 25639)

Confirmed by CLDR and a native speaker: "abril" is more often used even
if "abrial" is also correct.  Both nominative (alt_mon) and genitive (mon)
cases are updated.
---
 localedata/locales/oc_FR | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/localedata/locales/oc_FR b/localedata/locales/oc_FR
index 9d616abcdb..ba9377ed41 100644
--- a/localedata/locales/oc_FR
+++ b/localedata/locales/oc_FR
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ abmon   "gen.";/
 alt_mon "geni<U00E8>r";/
         "febri<U00E8>r";/
         "mar<U00E7>";/
-        "abrial";/
+        "abril";/
         "mai";/
         "junh";/
         "julhet";/
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ alt_mon "geni<U00E8>r";/
 mon     "de geni<U00E8>r";/
         "de febri<U00E8>r";/
         "de mar<U00E7>";/
-        "d<U2019>abrial";/
+        "d<U2019>abril";/
         "de mai";/
         "de junh";/
         "de julhet";/
-- 
2.21.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH COMMITTED] oc_FR locale: Fix spelling of April (bug 25639)
  2020-04-06 22:30 [PATCH COMMITTED] oc_FR locale: Fix spelling of April (bug 25639) Rafal Luzynski
@ 2020-04-06 22:48 ` Rafal Luzynski
  2020-04-30 19:53   ` Rafal Luzynski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafal Luzynski @ 2020-04-06 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Libc-alpha; +Cc: quentinantonin, Carlos O'Donell, Siddhesh Poyarekar

The question is: may I backport this fix [1] and even more important
the previous one [2] [3] to 2.31 so that the distros having their new
releases this quarter will have a chance to apply them?  Carlos?  Siddhesh?

Regards,

Rafal


[1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-April/112592.html
[2] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-March/111973.html
[3] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-March/111974.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH COMMITTED] oc_FR locale: Fix spelling of April (bug 25639)
  2020-04-06 22:48 ` Rafal Luzynski
@ 2020-04-30 19:53   ` Rafal Luzynski
  2020-05-01  3:06     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafal Luzynski @ 2020-04-30 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafal Luzynski via Libc-alpha; +Cc: quentinantonin, carlos, siddhesh

7.04.2020 00:48 Rafal Luzynski via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
wrote:
> 
> The question is: may I backport this fix [1] and even more important
> the previous one [2] [3] to 2.31 so that the distros having their new
> releases this quarter will have a chance to apply them?  Carlos?
>  Siddhesh?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rafal
> 
> 
> [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-April/112592.html
> [2] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-March/111973.html
> [3] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-March/111974.html

Ping...  "No" is a good answer if that's what you think.

Regards,

Rafal

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH COMMITTED] oc_FR locale: Fix spelling of April (bug 25639)
  2020-04-30 19:53   ` Rafal Luzynski
@ 2020-05-01  3:06     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
  2020-05-09 15:40       ` Rafal Luzynski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Siddhesh Poyarekar @ 2020-05-01  3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafal Luzynski, Rafal Luzynski via Libc-alpha; +Cc: quentinantonin, carlos

On 01/05/20 01:23, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> 7.04.2020 00:48 Rafal Luzynski via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> The question is: may I backport this fix [1] and even more important
>> the previous one [2] [3] to 2.31 so that the distros having their new
>> releases this quarter will have a chance to apply them?  Carlos?
>>  Siddhesh?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Rafal
>>
>>
>> [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-April/112592.html
>> [2] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-March/111973.html
>> [3] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-March/111974.html
> 
> Ping...  "No" is a good answer if that's what you think.

Yes you may backport the fix.  In general you may backport fixes without
asking for consensus as long as it does not have an ABI impact and it
fixes a bug.

Siddhesh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH COMMITTED] oc_FR locale: Fix spelling of April (bug 25639)
  2020-05-01  3:06     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
@ 2020-05-09 15:40       ` Rafal Luzynski
  2020-05-09 18:51         ` Florian Weimer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafal Luzynski @ 2020-05-09 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Siddhesh Poyarekar, Rafal Luzynski via Libc-alpha; +Cc: quentinantonin, carlos

1.05.2020 05:06 Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org> wrote:
> [...]
> Yes you may backport the fix.

Thank you, backported to 2.31 now.

> In general you may backport fixes without
> asking for consensus as long as it does not have an ABI impact and it
> fixes a bug.

I thought the policy was different and actually some of my patches had
been rejected from the backport.  Maybe the policy had been different
in the past.

Indeed, it fixes a bug (typo) and does not have an ABI impact and does
not increase the string width.

Regards,

Rafal

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH COMMITTED] oc_FR locale: Fix spelling of April (bug 25639)
  2020-05-09 15:40       ` Rafal Luzynski
@ 2020-05-09 18:51         ` Florian Weimer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Florian Weimer @ 2020-05-09 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafal Luzynski via Libc-alpha
  Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar, Rafal Luzynski, quentinantonin

* Rafal Luzynski via Libc-alpha:

> 1.05.2020 05:06 Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org> wrote:
>> [...]
>> Yes you may backport the fix.
>
> Thank you, backported to 2.31 now.
>
>> In general you may backport fixes without
>> asking for consensus as long as it does not have an ABI impact and it
>> fixes a bug.
>
> I thought the policy was different and actually some of my patches had
> been rejected from the backport.  Maybe the policy had been different
> in the past.

The policy has not changed.

Some locale updates are more risky, with collation updates that may
cause silent corruption of database indices at the extreme end.  I
don't think we should do those in a stable release.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-09 18:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-06 22:30 [PATCH COMMITTED] oc_FR locale: Fix spelling of April (bug 25639) Rafal Luzynski
2020-04-06 22:48 ` Rafal Luzynski
2020-04-30 19:53   ` Rafal Luzynski
2020-05-01  3:06     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-05-09 15:40       ` Rafal Luzynski
2020-05-09 18:51         ` Florian Weimer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).