From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu (mail.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.66]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 687FC3858C78 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 16:00:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 687FC3858C78 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cs.ucla.edu Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cs.ucla.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16BF3C011BD4; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 09:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id QzeqZapiAnS7; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 09:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8B03C011BD5; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 09:00:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.cs.ucla.edu 5F8B03C011BD5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.ucla.edu; s=9D0B346E-2AEB-11ED-9476-E14B719DCE6C; t=1694016006; bh=5MJ3T+UrYlSq7D5Y39YhdQaNoGuyw1L4WGxSbS9fx58=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:From; b=YmQbnBL+H0P63Ddt/sYMEc5OUbmFXhf5j+TnhOKyN2osALnqwx2jffArOJ9vtcuCD UtaVGAeu82RB3DKNB85usJ1FyVdahW/JSlaov8snZKbaCIWHB5K+JN1AT0//DZbh6c UvOSfpa8TPvGNGE03BmwJlVHvKOwJ9g9vXARtOBSQmU2vWUAULsZ+5PwzcwZHwDqo3 aOTJOINSeLezON6uDReSii/hCLCDechRXdlcyeKns36vNTTJpM0SDcU1tmtC4wMTGa /eylYe+zJTFkEJtkn5/2GjOK2H0G5yCNoUGeEidYF8HCU2WZ0vpBIGHiUXoiiGkmT3 x6VH3XkmuBecA== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.cs.ucla.edu Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id C5A0zoIshnGS; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 09:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-172-91-119-151.socal.res.rr.com [172.91.119.151]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F7033C011BD4; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 09:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <63d0c6d3-4e7c-6e04-b9a5-fe28b39d16bc@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 09:00:04 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Subject: Re: GNU C Library as its own CNA? To: Florian Weimer Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <1f5a1295-36d1-ab5e-86ec-1e91acefc63f@gotplt.org> <6ad61af4-8890-809c-d168-5a6e8c750d26@cs.ucla.edu> <8734zrzdjz.fsf@oldenburg3.str.redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department In-Reply-To: <8734zrzdjz.fsf@oldenburg3.str.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 2023-09-06 05:33, Florian Weimer wrote: > That's not the documented purpose of: Good point; we'd need to change that mailing list's purpose. There would be pros and cons for that, the pros being mostly for people sending in bug reports (because to them it's simpler to have one security contact point for all GNU projects) and the cons being mostly for us.