From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 88088 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2017 16:44:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 87993 invoked by uid 89); 21 Mar 2017 16:44:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=UD:htm X-HELO: mail-qk0-f178.google.com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9jNEQvOVyKXQ7b4hzshhfk7tvWxARenh3kVvxRUgsFo=; b=QdZzQUtci1YnKjB4lxQOcXAQBP7tJ2PEA7mR5fs6eqCwXMu4XABoTQ4+J/mPF3CBvr IqPtnU1XfAXgq0uobIB5gUoOqub+c8HuJkKNtCromR0JeIy0cK+p/9X7lGdTRfaYXnw9 FyR17KQ8bjTokZgGc4Kc//FwnMZt94ZtavVM6A137uXm+Mg1s4DF/Gs6qODxs0zSP5ED 0jEqJ6vzhvdTBlpMRSxFE/8cDeOsZEsTyT1rmtdTBhl3K58zKzVnGX1vDNN8fD3ATJWq xSMQT2MgeV/GkA7deuJV8EmRX0hePjE//DoxZYWfkFu3M9FW9+Vc+18yHjKaNYoZUF6y Kkfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2zk8n8shwqIG0+Q1rHqNHA4zS2cDjGoE5eI1VOIaJeuwrlTCc9GIGKrzB2RvpQ6Yl8 X-Received: by 10.55.116.71 with SMTP id p68mr32871000qkc.278.1490114643829; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for ISO C11 threads.h To: Joseph Myers References: <1490103612-9401-1-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org From: Adhemerval Zanella Message-ID: <662cb906-1845-1164-5b61-a575c5edfe07@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:44:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg00479.txt.bz2 On 21/03/2017 13:25, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Tue, 21 Mar 2017, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > >> - Addresses Joseph's comments from [2] and ad indicated in >> in C11 thread patch I based this implementation from th >> public C11 thread document I have access [3]. I would ask for >> suggestion and change if it deviates from the final standard >> definition. > > Did you review those C11 DRs related to threads to make sure the > implementation behaves properly regarding issues raised in those DRs (and > that there are tests of this if applicable)? > > Current DR log: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2109.htm > Thanks for the link, I will check this out. Do you know off the top of your head which ones would be applicable?