From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] linux: Fix ancillary 64-bit time timestamp conversion (BZ #28349, BZ #28350)
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:26:16 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <699abc23-7e47-a85f-e553-b5a6c0b1f426@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y2352try.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
On 24/01/2022 09:38, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Adhemerval Zanella:
>
>> On 24/01/2022 09:13, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Adhemerval Zanella:
>>>
>>>>> typo: MSG_[C]TRUNC
>>>>>
>>>>> (I think this MSG_CTRUNC result is a remaining bug we need to fix
>>>>> separately for time32 mode.)
>>>>
>>>> Do you mean not returning the MSG_CTRUNC?
>>>
>>> No, if the caller uses CMSG_SPACE to allocate space for the expected
>>> ancillary data, we should not produce MSG_CTRUNC by stuffing in
>>> ancillary data that has not been requested. Maybe we can do this for
>>> time32 code only. Again it seems that userspace emulation is rather
>>> questionable here.
>>
>> But this would be only an issue for applications using _TIME_BITS=64
>> running on older kernels (so 32 bit timestamps would be visible to
>> the caller). Since 64 bit is a opt-in feature, I think users will
>> see way more potential issues running _TIME_BITS=64 on older kernels.
>
> As far as I can see, it is currently an issue for time32 applications
> running on old and new kernels. We synthesize the time64 control
> messages unconditionally.
time32 applications running on any kernel will continue to see the
timestamps because they will use the old SO_ constants and kernel will
synthesize them on the ancillary buffer.
It might be a problem only when time32 application use the new 64 bit
time_t SO_ constants either though a library built with _TIME_SIZE=64
or by using it directly (which should not be straightforward since both
kernel and glibc only define the 64 bit constants for _TIME_BITS=64).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-24 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-22 18:52 Adhemerval Zanella
2022-01-12 13:36 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-01-21 13:53 ` Florian Weimer
2022-01-24 12:07 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-01-24 12:13 ` Florian Weimer
2022-01-24 12:23 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-01-24 12:38 ` Florian Weimer
2022-01-24 13:26 ` Adhemerval Zanella [this message]
2022-01-26 20:48 ` Florian Weimer
2022-01-27 11:23 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-01-27 11:58 ` Florian Weimer
2022-01-27 12:19 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-01-27 13:32 ` Florian Weimer
2022-01-27 13:55 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-01-27 14:09 ` Florian Weimer
2022-01-27 14:13 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-01-27 14:17 ` Adhemerval Zanella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=699abc23-7e47-a85f-e553-b5a6c0b1f426@linaro.org \
--to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).