From: Marko Myllynen <myllynen@redhat.com>
To: Stanislav Brabec <sbrabec@suse.cz>,
GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Cc: Mike Fabian <mfabian@redhat.com>, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Locales: Thousands separator
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 13:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c2cead5-c8d2-1e85-f6f1-a2007fa65d0e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b931a1c-8646-960a-c51e-8f65a7f384f1@suse.cz>
Hi Stanislav,
On 04/12/2019 18.57, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> On 06/20 2018 at 05:20 PM Stanislav Brabec wrote:
>> Marko Myllynen wrote:
>>> Commit 70a6707 [1] changed many locales to use U+202F NARROW NO-BREAK
>>> SPACE (NNBSP) as the thousands separator instead of U+00A0 NO-BREAK
>>> SPACE (NBSP). The patch submission nor the follow-up discussion [2] did
>>> not cite any standards or references as rationale for this change.
> ...
>>> I have been under impression that the long-term plan for glibc locales
>>> would be to use CLDR data as source to the extent possible so this
>>> change would seem to be at odds with that plan. I found no indications
>>> from CLDR Trac that CLDR would be switching to NNBSP. This inconsistency
>>> also presents a dilemma for keymap definitions when there is only one
>>> feasible key combination available for producing non-breaking space:
>>> which variant to choose, the glibc one or the CLDR one.
>>>
>>> Given the considerations above, what do the glibc maintainers think
>>> about the current situation, is this inconsistency seen as an issue?
>>
>> When I proposed this change, I was not aware of use of CLDR.
>>
>> Created ticket now:
>> https://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/11217
>>
> CLDR decided to accept the NNBSP approach.
>
> In the CLDR version 36, they decided to use French as a NNBSP trial:
> https://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/36/by_type/numbers.symbols.html#a1ef41eaeb6982d
Thanks for the heads-up. However, I'm unable to find where this
intention is clearly stated, could you please share a public reference
for this that could be used to pass the news onwards?
Thanks,
--
Marko Myllynen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-12 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-20 8:11 Marko Myllynen
2018-06-20 13:01 ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-20 13:17 ` Marko Myllynen
2018-06-20 15:36 ` Mike FABIAN
2018-06-20 17:25 ` Marko Myllynen
2018-06-20 21:26 ` Andreas Schwab
2018-06-21 13:07 ` Marko Myllynen
2018-06-25 16:48 ` Marko Myllynen
2018-06-20 16:42 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-20 15:20 ` Stanislav Brabec
2018-06-20 15:52 ` Mike FABIAN
2019-12-04 16:57 ` Stanislav Brabec
2019-12-12 13:03 ` Marko Myllynen [this message]
2019-12-12 14:16 ` Stanislav Brabec
2019-12-12 15:16 ` Marko Myllynen
2018-06-20 22:42 ` Rafal Luzynski
2018-06-21 14:16 ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-21 20:31 ` Rafal Luzynski
2018-06-27 6:31 ` Mike FABIAN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c2cead5-c8d2-1e85-f6f1-a2007fa65d0e@redhat.com \
--to=myllynen@redhat.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=mfabian@redhat.com \
--cc=sbrabec@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).