From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 58169 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2016 14:30:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 58150 invoked by uid 89); 15 Nov 2016 14:29:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove cached PID/TID in clone To: Adhemerval Zanella , libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <1476387924-4509-1-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <58c8bc8e-e643-2d3a-5e57-55a3457ca70f@redhat.com> From: Florian Weimer Message-ID: <6d415988-fb13-5f58-70fc-8b7d3d5ccfde@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:30:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00494.txt.bz2 On 11/15/2016 03:26 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > On 09/11/2016 10:18, Florian Weimer wrote: >> >> I really think we should document the clone system call wrapper and spell out these requirements, but that's a separate matter. >> > > Right, I think we can update documentation after patch is upstream. Agreed. > I also did a full check on aarch64, powerpc64le, and armhf. I also did > some basic tests (basically the posix and nptl one involving clone/fork) > on a simulated sparc{64} and mips{64} machine to check if I missed > something in clone/vfork assembly changes. I'm happy with the patch as-is. I'd suggest to wait another week to see if the architecture maintainers have further comments and if not, check it in. Thanks, Florian