public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* --disable-shared support
@ 2018-06-25 14:49 Florian Weimer
  2018-06-26 21:07 ` Joseph Myers
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Florian Weimer @ 2018-06-25 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: GNU C Library

--disable-shared has apparently been broken for a long, long time. 
Should we remove any vestiges of support for it?

Thanks,
Florian

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: --disable-shared support
  2018-06-25 14:49 --disable-shared support Florian Weimer
@ 2018-06-26 21:07 ` Joseph Myers
  2018-06-29 10:13   ` Florian Weimer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Myers @ 2018-06-26 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Florian Weimer; +Cc: GNU C Library

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, Florian Weimer wrote:

> --disable-shared has apparently been broken for a long, long time. Should we
> remove any vestiges of support for it?

I think we should fix this problem (bug 20845), to facilitate 
--disable-shared being used as a way to run the full testsuite for static 
linking.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: --disable-shared support
  2018-06-26 21:07 ` Joseph Myers
@ 2018-06-29 10:13   ` Florian Weimer
  2018-06-29 16:57     ` Joseph Myers
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Florian Weimer @ 2018-06-29 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joseph Myers; +Cc: GNU C Library

On 06/26/2018 11:07 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, Florian Weimer wrote:
> 
>> --disable-shared has apparently been broken for a long, long time. Should we
>> remove any vestiges of support for it?
> 
> I think we should fix this problem (bug 20845), to facilitate
> --disable-shared being used as a way to run the full testsuite for static
> linking.

Is this the only reason for fixing it?

I wonder if we should link and run all tests statically which can run 
statically linked, rather than relying on tests opting in explicitly 
(which some do).

Thanks,
Florian

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: --disable-shared support
  2018-06-29 10:13   ` Florian Weimer
@ 2018-06-29 16:57     ` Joseph Myers
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Myers @ 2018-06-29 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Florian Weimer; +Cc: GNU C Library

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018, Florian Weimer wrote:

> I wonder if we should link and run all tests statically which can run
> statically linked, rather than relying on tests opting in explicitly (which
> some do).

I think that's excessive for normal testing, but there should be an easy 
way to run all tests for static linking when desired.

--disable-shared really should only reduce the set of files built and 
installed, and result in some installed and test executables being 
statically linked - it should not have major differences in the build 
process from the default case, and if it does, that sounds like something 
to fix.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-06-29 16:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-06-25 14:49 --disable-shared support Florian Weimer
2018-06-26 21:07 ` Joseph Myers
2018-06-29 10:13   ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-29 16:57     ` Joseph Myers

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).