From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 45486 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2018 16:17:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 44709 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jul 2018 16:17:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=(unknown), mysterious, respond X-HELO: mail-qt0-f175.google.com Return-Path: Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] Add a new mutex type PTHREAD_MUTEX_QUEUESPINNER_NP To: "Wang, Kemi" , Adhemerval Zanella , Florian Weimer , Rical Jason , Glibc alpha Cc: Dave Hansen , "Chen, Tim C" , "Kleen, Andi" , "Huang, Ying" , "Lu, Aaron" , "Li, Aubrey" References: <1530519116-13103-1-git-send-email-kemi.wang@intel.com> <11b23352-762c-3f35-8bbf-da9fbfef075c@redhat.com> <4b86721b-56f0-2968-305e-176198cf2cf8@intel.com> <57de1db9-f81d-2732-fb2f-25009201697c@redhat.com> <25017BF213203E48912DB000DE5F5E1E6B834079@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: Carlos O'Donell Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <726b368c-ec10-999f-8ad5-a5c4444f5b73@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 16:17:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <25017BF213203E48912DB000DE5F5E1E6B834079@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-07/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 On 07/06/2018 11:56 AM, Wang, Kemi wrote: >> Given that distributions could backport this (no new symbols, just >> a new flag), is there really any rush in getting it reviewed? > > To be honest, yes, please. And I will respond your feedback ASAP. This sounds mysterious. Why are you in a rush? -- Cheers, Carlos.