From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72783858D3C for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:34:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B72783858D3C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org B72783858D3C Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1714397665; cv=none; b=pbdEVODC1j53VpOWZGcjX+pjXTbDXc42bgsDZEV42+2c++tp/whlCoxc3Ry5yMHXa0j/dr+Pog/XSF6tNCtBYoK4oQnqXhaYVnn6PLp0PAzFebVdUVA0VgfO8eUPs4bH6g29TpuM7CMKvpAU4PrQnHsjFrQj51RaGVr9HTDfY6c= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1714397665; c=relaxed/simple; bh=w7GeqqhiV2KQkIoKY3F8GUNCqtG9oycdd80kq5L1iyA=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=FlH+jY8R+Bw9bNzw/205x8OPWos2lRj7nIZ4Vy9gQ+ZkzKcu4Igr4S2gJSOrNWcCzbL3F5tSKoTdPH529QKcjYmgh4C2Lm0oyxqAIe1+QIMfYcLhaJbEiqXYuYgH7KVnhA6reWoaUE2lU7sTvbfgS8i7elQqvwxbWDRaOSWI1E8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1714397654; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zfRow/aDcCJpaBe4tLczwr9mKdQFI8RR4sLQPlpcTPk=; b=d7LsdVQHWbzAZPuS4tQyOAsT3PACk7xgE+rGUDa3uyHFQw5GV/2t6n59OESEq9Ja2HTgag lp0AAq+ulPOhZ7J2iQmK6xPkWXABmW3CZQt/5q45ZlenZtTo70OoKh6CyrKOX8dqsuNRmh hGtc6xKgrrdNIQ/YkTAs+lTUZ3MsBiY= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-639-3cKokoOvMzCxo-na3xuxVA-1; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 09:34:11 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 3cKokoOvMzCxo-na3xuxVA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-41bf6751b28so9001335e9.2 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 06:34:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714397650; x=1715002450; h=mime-version:references:message-id:in-reply-to:subject:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zfRow/aDcCJpaBe4tLczwr9mKdQFI8RR4sLQPlpcTPk=; b=LIXuPg4WAO/3QRGbSBYfV/21mJsru5ODg9KAbHWBNf5dLJMhiNUrnWAXUrVbLLvdYp oYCh5GVcUcHHdUC4HgVbiCm2yY8FzmLY2PZPaJUcsEJCl+aJSZZaYyL8R2lNo+dAb/FZ THrZvIg+S1F8mCMFTG+djPMS5GKNc16C5wG0SqJgX2VxacQML8Rd0FUoUGT8Yt8jS0TG j40L+/kokmJGlJsprx3HEvcvyKHwydbgZ26710J10WwYqAov/P8jLNeFBRvWkpxa405K Ql8X9kWFaXqdmWRLFkEPtI9xCBT8PzK/S3BoK5zrXVxEXat/xeMgvxwx2MD/TeLpHnEa LKYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxRHGmIFB95PVSZAv0NEX1g8FhFb6Xquhejv4QPPil07JUVksmy v9iRMwsTkhngvJxGpu7D0g6UAmkYW2jCrVjxHMPCQCMj9ZhVU3CWbwi7AKh6meZx9wnwjngpZ/T ++xgTceRZ3GPdZHVTOiwo0Dv3UEg6dqdt4mtxi8cGNDhy980k+kWskznhVZEV0G3xU3JRJ7wZSG lkdV1ZwBkqtl3X4Q7Vw+V2oY9mOkpE/Ksh8ZeLS043fg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4e0e:b0:41b:935:24a9 with SMTP id b14-20020a05600c4e0e00b0041b093524a9mr5816957wmq.24.1714397650216; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 06:34:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHMsGfRv/k0AlAsi+GUJIXEnWN6/nDcgSj8BPJ6UiS7fNYA52e0t4UyWUTASh4E1cKF6EiRNw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4e0e:b0:41b:935:24a9 with SMTP id b14-20020a05600c4e0e00b0041b093524a9mr5816939wmq.24.1714397649741; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 06:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (digraph.polyomino.org.uk. [2001:8b0:bf73:93f7::51bb:e332]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p6-20020a05600c468600b00418accde252sm41831410wmo.30.2024.04.29.06.34.09 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 29 Apr 2024 06:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1s1R8y-003G08-9W for libc-alpha@sourceware.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:34:08 +0000 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:34:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Joseph Myers To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Ping Re: Implement C23 log2p1 In-Reply-To: <41a4a6c9-4942-a9be-9459-1aaeb44ffee8@redhat.com> Message-ID: <7468e028-70b-e9d1-1985-70fef8ab950@redhat.com> References: <41a4a6c9-4942-a9be-9459-1aaeb44ffee8@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: I'd like to ping this patch , and, in particular: (a) the actual content of the patch, which no-one has commented on (instead preferring to suggest other things to add to it); (b) the questions of what goes in such patches, where I argue that we should not expect libm-test-ulps updates for more than one architecture, or additional test inputs based on searches for worst-case inputs, to be included in such a patch: that it should be sufficient to include libm-test-ulps updates for a single architecture, and tests that seem appropriate based on the mathematical properties of the function being tested, and further additions there can reasonably be made in followup patches. (Note that even if we moved to a single libm-test-ulps shared between architectures and listing expected ulps based on floating-point format rather than type, it still wouldn't be possible to update all ulps on a single system: no architecture supports both ldbl-96 and ldbl-128ibm.) -- Joseph S. Myers josmyers@redhat.com