Re: [PATCH 4/4] configure: Disable building libcrypt by default

[Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org>]

On 2023-07-14 02:21, Sam James wrote:
> 
> Siddhesh Poyarekar via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org> writes:
> 
>> We mentioned eventual dropping of libcrypt in the 2.28 NEWS.  Actually
>> put that plan in motion by first disabling building libcrypt by default.
>> In the near future we need to drop it completely but ISTM that Gentoo
>> still uses it to fix some perl compatibility issues.
> 
> Thanks. This is fine for us: we did the migration in two stages in
> Mid-to-late 2021.
> 
> You are right that we've got a workaround for some Perl rebuild issues,
> but that should've been fixed on our end in the package manager last
> month, so no problem from us. Thank you for checking!
>>   
>> +* libcrypt is no longer built by default, one may use the --enable-crypt
>> +  option to build libcrypt.  It is recommended that applications port
>> +  away from the GNU C Library implementation of libcrypt since it will
>> +  likely be removed in a future release.
> 
> I feel like we ought to explicitly name libxcrypt as a possible
> provider - I don't really like relying on word of mouth for this.
> 
> We don't need to endorse it/recommend it (although what's the
> alternative?), but I think mentioning it is worthwhile.
> 
> (ditto for texi change.)
> 

Should we put a date on it, i.e. say explicitly that it will be removed 
in 2.39?

Thanks,
Sid