From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0790D385802A for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:21:58 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 0790D385802A Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11GG3aqC110457 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:21:58 -0500 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36rgrp1ebq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:21:57 -0500 Received: from m0187473.ppops.net (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 11GG3jiM110902 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:21:57 -0500 Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36rgrp1ea4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:21:57 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11GGIUTB022509; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:21:53 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36p6d8awgg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:21:53 +0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 11GGLpFo41091394 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:21:51 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250355204F; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:21:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc4452167425.ibm.com (unknown [9.171.60.60]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF26D5204E; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:21:50 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [COMMITTED] S390: Add new hwcap values. To: Florian Weimer , Stefan Liebler via Libc-alpha References: <20210216154015.7644-1-stli@linux.ibm.com> <87h7mc2ec3.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> From: Stefan Liebler Message-ID: <78e65c32-695a-f29f-5f48-90c91fea38cc@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:21:50 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87h7mc2ec3.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-16_06:2021-02-16, 2021-02-16 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=943 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102160141 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:22:00 -0000 On 2/16/21 4:59 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Stefan Liebler via Libc-alpha: > >> The new hwcap values indicate support for arch14 architecture. > > I hope it's deliberate not to update HWCAP_IMPORTANT. > > Should we add an arch14 glibc-hwcaps subdirectory, or can that wait? > > Thanks, > Florian > Hi Florian, I won't update HWCAP_IMPORTANT. Even if in future the libraries are not loaded anymore in a subdirectory with AT_PLATFORM string, I want to keep it in sync with the glibc-hwcaps subdirectory mechanism. As soon as I know the name, I will post a further patch. This will also introduce a further libmarkermod5.so in order to extend tst-glibc-hwcaps. Thanks, Stefan