From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-106024-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 109742 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2019 13:31:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 109734 invoked by uid 89); 16 Oct 2019 13:31:53 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-14.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*f:sk:87bluh5, H*i:sk:87bluh5, H*MI:sk:87bluh5, HX-Gm-Message-State:APjAAAV
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] elf: Always set l in _dl_init_paths (Bug 23462).
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
References: <ca723e73-c8eb-ca4c-1ca0-5fbf2b88edcd@redhat.com>
 <87d0ex6mo6.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
 <8b35f8b3-1d61-dce0-f59a-42c104449a44@redhat.com>
 <87bluh53z3.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <79397430-ce3f-446e-eadb-18531ad5ae79@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 13:31:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87bluh53z3.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg00487.txt.bz2

On 10/16/19 7:23 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Carlos O'Donell:
> 
>>> Does this change enable DT_RUNPATH/DT_RPATH for statically linked
>>> binaries?  Should that receive a NEWS entry and a test?
>>
>> It does enable DT_RUNPATH/DT_RPATH for statically linked binaries,
>> and we should probably add a test for that?
> 
> Right.

Perfect, let me do that. I'll add another test.

>> If you think the semantic change here is wrong, please call that out.
> 
> No, I think it would be a useful feature.  I sort-of ran into this here:
> 
>   resolv/tst-idna_name_classify: Isolate from system libraries
>   <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-10/msg00338.html>
> 
> And I briefly wondered if we should do this automatically for
> --enable-hardcoded-path-in-tests.
> 
> Thanks,
> Florian
> 


-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.