From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eliz@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFF50384801F
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:57:20 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org CFF50384801F
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40892)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lxshK-0005oL-Fp; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:57:19 -0400
Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3041
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lxshI-0007WZ-Vx; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:57:18 -0400
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:57:16 +0300
Message-Id: <834kdiox4j.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
Cc: fweimer@redhat.com, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
In-Reply-To: <78c1b48e-2008-b703-321b-8d572dee3a71@gotplt.org> (message from
 Siddhesh Poyarekar on Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:36:21 +0530)
Subject: Re: Seeking input from developers: glibc copyright assignment policy.
References: <4369849.fY2oj7UdlA@omega>
 <a6437c73-cc30-cd3f-6ef3-a39174596d03@gotplt.org> <83sg17rrf6.fsf@gnu.org>
 <e9b2c48f-e80f-51be-6f6f-57472394f29b@gotplt.org> <83k0misbni.fsf@gnu.org>
 <3e0c8f21-422b-ffd6-d939-49f88f09cac7@gotplt.org> <83fsx6s9so.fsf@gnu.org>
 <2619fea4-4fb4-84cf-b9d2-f1ef21d40bcb@gotplt.org>
 <fb1e8467-1179-2307-24b8-d82b9e1d4c6e@gotplt.org> <83a6nerxhg.fsf@gnu.org>
 <42bd0b29-7bcd-1c3a-4fde-269d869b0afb@gotplt.org>
 <87mtre9m53.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
 <0676248d-9143-0d4f-5af7-b9bbcce1cb81@gotplt.org>
 <87im229laa.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
 <51a5326b-e870-1202-3dde-970f77a16471@gotplt.org> <835yy2rrd3.fsf@gnu.org>
 <b8b1316b-9d1b-5a21-4e46-d1ceb88062fd@gotplt.org> <83pmw9qgqk.fsf@gnu.org>
 <3d846805-d11d-74c4-d513-ec1aeb1077fa@gotplt.org> <83czs6p58q.fsf@gnu.org>
 <78c1b48e-2008-b703-321b-8d572dee3a71@gotplt.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 14:57:21 -0000

> Cc: fweimer@redhat.com, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
> From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:36:21 +0530
> 
> To be clear, I don't doubt the FSF's intention with respect to the 
> agreement.  I have no reason to believe that they'll misuse the 
> assignment not do I have any interest in relicensing code I have 
> assigned to the FSF either directly or otherwise.  What I am trying to 
> get across however is that there's no canonical interpretation.

If the FSF interpret that in this way, then that _is_ the canonical
interpretation.