From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42CF8385803D for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2021 16:48:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 42CF8385803D Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44178) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m0Rlq-0008Le-23; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 12:48:34 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2972 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m0Rln-0001xg-Od; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 12:48:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 19:48:37 +0300 Message-Id: <83bl7ghfkq.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Szabolcs Nagy Cc: craigt@fsf.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, fweimer@redhat.com, siddhesh@gotplt.org In-Reply-To: <20210705145902.GL14854@arm.com> (message from Szabolcs Nagy on Mon, 5 Jul 2021 15:59:03 +0100) Subject: Re: Seeking input from developers: glibc copyright assignment policy. References: <20210705145902.GL14854@arm.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 16:48:37 -0000 > Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 15:59:03 +0100 > From: Szabolcs Nagy > Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, fweimer@redhat.com, siddhesh@gotplt.org, > eliz@gnu.org > > > The grant back in section 1 (d) of the FSF's copyright assignment > > gives control to the developer who can then decide who gets to use the > > code and under what terms, but the developer cannot limit how the FSF > > distributes and uses the code, which is under a free license, most > > likely the GPLv3 or later. > > a copyright assignment cannot possibly "give control" > to the developer: there can be multiple projects that > require assignment (or even just a statement from the > owner) and the developer cannot contribte the same > code to those (you can only assign ownership once). AFAIK, that's not true: the developer _can_ assign the copyright to more than one project.