public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jochen Hein <jochen@jochen.org>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>,
	GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	coordinator@translationproject.org
Subject: Re: glibc 2.25 development --- 46 days to freeze.
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 06:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83y40e4rda.fsf@echidna.jochen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f434f21-d9ae-b907-4647-26ae6e517eba@gotplt.org> (Siddhesh Poyarekar's message of "Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:09:54 +0530")

Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org> writes:

> On Wednesday 16 November 2016 11:26 AM, Jochen Hein wrote:
>> Can we get a snapshot of the current pot-file out to the translators? We
>> missed the last two releases, so I guess we need some time to catch up.
>> We can (and should) refresh the pot file after the freeze to translate
>> the last (hopefully few) messages before the release.
>
> I think that is a good idea.  In fact, would it be more productive to
> tweak the current workflow a bit so that translators can pull directly
> from git instead of using tarballs?  I am referring to the libc.pot
> workflow documented in our Release wiki[1] that requires the release
> manager to upload a tarball and then email coordinator AT
> translationproject DOT org.  Instead, the glibc release manager could
> just send out the email when they update libc.pot and translators can
> pull from git.  I reckon this could even be automated in a git
> post-commit hook.
>
> Thoughts?

I'm fine with it - usually a translater has no need to look at the
sources. And since tarballs tend to get/be big it might be ok to check
only some strings in cgit or something else.

The translationproject has this for sending out a new .pot-file
[http://translationproject.org/html/maintainers.html]:

,----
| Announcing
| 
| To announce a new POT file, merely send the URL of a packaged
| distribution of your program to
| <coordinator@translationproject.org>. Best is to use the string
| "DOMAIN-VERSION.pot" somewhere in the subject line of your mail. The
| Translation Project will process a POT file only once, so another
| submission must use a newer VERSION. The distribution tarball pointed to
| by the URL does not have to be official, it does not even have to
| compile: its goal is merely to provide finer context for strings to be
| translated, in case translators need such references.
| 
| The very first time you submit a POT file, the Translation Project also
| needs to know which email address to use for notifications, and if you
| want translated PO files sent in full to you or a mere URL pointing to
| them.
| 
| You may submit new POT files as often as you want. You might wish to
| avoid exhausting translation teams, but we have never yet received a
| complaint. So don't hesitate submitting it if just a few weeks after the
| previous one you have a new release. 
`----

Custom in the past has been to refer to the tarball in the announcement,
but at least we can check with the translation coordinator - hence the
CC:

Comments?

Jochen

> [1] https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release

-- 
The only problem with troubleshooting is that the trouble shoots back.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-20  6:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-15 20:55 Carlos O'Donell
2016-11-16  5:57 ` Jochen Hein
2016-11-20  4:40   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-11-20  6:11     ` Jochen Hein [this message]
2016-11-20 11:34       ` Benno Schulenberg
2016-11-20 13:08         ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-12-01 13:32   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-12-01 16:03     ` Joseph Myers
2016-12-02 15:53       ` Carlos O'Donell
2016-12-02 15:57         ` Joseph Myers
2016-12-02 16:15           ` Carlos O'Donell
2016-12-02 15:54     ` Carlos O'Donell
2016-12-02 18:16       ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-12-19 23:06         ` Carlos O'Donell
2016-12-20 16:54           ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-12-02 18:18       ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-12-19 14:24         ` Carlos O'Donell
2016-12-16 22:56       ` Mike Frysinger
2016-12-17  5:24         ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-11-21  0:17 ` Nix
2016-11-22 18:58   ` Florian Weimer
2016-12-17 15:13 ` Zack Weinberg
2016-12-19 13:58   ` Carlos O'Donell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83y40e4rda.fsf@echidna.jochen.org \
    --to=jochen@jochen.org \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=coordinator@translationproject.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).