From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C7F3858D39 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 12:23:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 65C7F3858D39 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org References: <20230307102935.2882450-1-arsen@gentoo.org> <87fsagpz3g.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <86o7p4wzan.fsf@gentoo.org> <87356gpxut.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.8.14; emacs 30.0.50 From: Arsen =?utf-8?Q?Arsenovi=C4=87?= To: Florian Weimer Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, carlos@redhat.com, toolchain@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] elf,nptl: Add -z lazy to some more tests Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 13:18:40 +0100 In-reply-to: <87356gpxut.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Message-ID: <86bkl4wy0v.fsf@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Florian Weimer writes: > * Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87: > >> Yes, I never signed the copyright papers for the libc. >> >> I intended to undergo that process, which is why I didn't add signoffs >> initially (since they'd indicate that I don't intend to sign over >> copyright when I do), so I figured I should wait for advice. >> >> How should I proceed? > > It's up to you. You can try the FSF paperwork process, it should be > fully digital nowadays. And we can apply the patch as a regular FSF > contribution once the paperwork is complete. My previous experiences were rather prompt (usually done by the time I'm done with a patchset - not the case here due to the triviality, of course). Is https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/plain/doc/Copyright/request-as= sign.future the right form? This is the one I've used for gcc et al, to cover current and future changes of any nature. > Or we can take a DCO contribution from you today. We don't need the > assignment paperwork anymore. > >> PS: I noticed that I forgot to drop `,nptl' from the subject line. The >> NPTL bits of this patch are gone now. > > Ah, okay. > > Thanks, > Florian =2D-=20 Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iOcEARYKAI8WIQT+4rPRE/wAoxYtYGFSwpQwHqLEkwUCZAcswF8UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0RkVF MkIzRDExM0ZDMDBBMzE2MkQ2MDYxNTJDMjk0MzAxRUEyQzQ5MxEcYXJzZW5AZ2Vu dG9vLm9yZwAKCRBSwpQwHqLEkwZ7AP4wgxQC0cK4FIDficGglMlzxWWDEGGhs/kZ uMYvPIEAeQD7BEtbb2DKjgMN7fPH3TmoFuENthUybFs5gT84Lpv7ygM= =VuA8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--