From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 466773858D39 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 14:03:40 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 466773858D39 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 466773858D39 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1718028230; cv=none; b=w5zwVyPqyRYinv3sEC+96CUrONrfIeqYRTLbnqoiIo1V+a2SdTCJgKSDalu2KZG19AzMe42LOE0Ix/Bu4y0rByrDDT+8mIXA2ZJ2oiijlI6MlFJITdXYU9GD5/zDMTBEbCOTfXhn6IyTJHcbEcb8X2Y98/Mnoy7VUxSPZovvrzk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1718028230; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fRbPI0xK/rTv4mVUMlbfqV+D+m6iTNvLByu+BL9tZc0=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=MrSeZTK4BcrXZ2HQlb4l8GpyzU4uKY+6a/UB9PkNX6stUHFI1VC97f1pSYN9xSrkneRpKBuXPEY+wOHmHUxmZmhC3nglSNsDxMwcYzDVqJe9MYdB+wVAwselPN9H06HUHom1mOVK18yFXZcNWSd+vC5htFkzNUq9Um8b/fIb8Q0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1718028220; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tcqViTFyPqRdFvbTS7i0j8CMRa68PbtuJQ8o7M0TslM=; b=iBh6ceVtjvBrwmrFgeyQGG0NEDJZdLh2F0CQTaqUIRiYmaZJ7J0zu1bOg9XSUJyIwDf9M7 BPa2T7xw9raLBW3y56Qn9SNMvK0Ef69F5ZhkSNvkbv6D+um9Z7NAr/uIGifHblqThd9yaU DHvWuDZ2J2Z4y09+jYo7PIqiS+K702M= Received: from mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-682-OSpwY7zyN4a45diEwWnjig-1; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:03:37 -0400 X-MC-Unique: OSpwY7zyN4a45diEwWnjig-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4019B1956062; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 14:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.193.168]) by mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3EDA1956087; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 14:03:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Stefan Liebler Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, devel@otheo.eu, adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org, bergner@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC 0/9] Remove legacy platform bits and cleanups In-Reply-To: (Stefan Liebler's message of "Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:23:04 +0200") References: <20240607114543.659306-1-stli@linux.ibm.com> <87frtp6j4g.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 16:03:30 +0200 Message-ID: <871q54rj2l.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.40 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: * Stefan Liebler: > Please also have a look, if you find the update of GLRO(dl_hwcap). I tright once more, even went back in Git history, and used hardware watchpoints, but the code I imagined is just not there. So I think it's okay to proceed with this (fix the MIPS issue 8-). Thanks, Florian