From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from albireo.enyo.de (albireo.enyo.de [37.24.231.21]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E59333898529 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:51:06 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E59333898529 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deneb.enyo.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fw@deneb.enyo.de Received: from [172.17.203.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by albireo.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1jUCOv-0008DZ-1N; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:51:05 +0000 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jUCOu-0004tt-Tn; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 18:51:04 +0200 From: Florian Weimer To: "H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha" Subject: Re: V2 [PATCH] Add a C wrapper for prctl [BZ #25896] References: <20200429205217.2435607-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <87wo5xa0yt.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20200430130333.GA254612@gmail.com> <39a57354-4ca8-53f5-bb89-dadf25f3671a@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 18:51:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: (H. J. Lu via Libc-alpha's message of "Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:35:35 -0700") Message-ID: <871ro49atj.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:51:08 -0000 * H. J. Lu via Libc-alpha: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 9:06 AM Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 30/04/2020 10:03, H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha wrote: >> >> > Here is the updated patch. I added the assembly version for x86. Other >> > arches can do >> > >> > #include >> >> Do we really an assembly optimization for this? I hardly think this >> a hotstop symbol. > > I have no strong opinion on this. Me neither.