From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 59578 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2019 07:05:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 59281 invoked by uid 89); 9 Oct 2019 07:05:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*f:sk:CAFyWVa, H*i:sk:CAFyWVa X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com From: Florian Weimer To: Jim Wilson Cc: GNU C Library , Palmer Dabbelt , DJ Delorie Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Remove support for variable page sizes References: <87r23y2br3.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 07:05:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Jim Wilson's message of "Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:47:48 -0700") Message-ID: <871rvm8klk.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg00234.txt.bz2 * Jim Wilson: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 5:45 AM Florian Weimer wrote: >> [NB: I could use some help with testing here.] > > I was out sick most of last week, but I did a top of tree > riscv64-linux native binutils/gcc/glibc build this week which ended up > testing your patch. I got 16 glibc failures which is what I expected. > 6 of those are asin/acos ULP problems, so I think only 10 real > problems. I did have to add -Wno-error=stringop-overflow to gccwarn > to complete the glibc build, but I believe that is a gcc bug, and I > see that there are already a number of stringop-overflow bugs that > have been reported, so it might be related to one of the existing bug > reports. Thanks for the additional testing. Florian