From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B2213857C51 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 08:27:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 5B2213857C51 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1689236867; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eUhEwjwQm87b1CEkOpyXaWANVt1z/QeUpDmXYhrzaEg=; b=W7/3dJ6TvKYr7hszu7tiAU5XeM1vRrXt9FzyxyntyrR5HOzgJU2rtOdZRx9LuOIcJZP4Lm dT6HJk6T2TfBFMf09JsLEXumHtutWkFu7OVszKAaLDZOjyyBQuLnZp2f0WaRXzUIDcuH0p dzMHtam2LtSl0Jp21SXYVVakRwTIKi8= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (66.187.233.73 [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-558-_cSz0WplPQWGsCz-ypzENA-1; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 04:27:39 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _cSz0WplPQWGsCz-ypzENA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1536280BC9C; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 08:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.2.16.19]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 364CC492B03; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 08:27:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Hiroaki.Fuse@sony.com Cc: "libc-alpha@sourceware.org" , "libc-stable@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] nscd: Move declarations used in the library out of References: <87ilb1yxkn.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 10:27:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Hiroaki's message of "Thu, 13 Jul 2023 08:06:11 +0000") Message-ID: <87351s1aiv.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: * Hiroaki: > Dear Florian Weimer, > > Thank you for your quick update. > My understanding is that we can conclude the license of glibc as LGPLv2.1 > after applying your patch. Is it correct? You need to perform your own license analysis. There are some resources that could help you, like the LICENSES file in the source tree. I'm not sure everyone would agree that =E2=80=9CLGPLv2.1=E2=80=9D is an accurate su= mmary. Thanks, Florian