From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58BFC3858C66 for ; Mon, 15 May 2023 13:09:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 58BFC3858C66 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1684156193; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mFv3B0zwTs/UwaXVJ40ZcIm0kwS1VHLl8sJfrnQ0PoQ=; b=Nw7X1LKfJHKCSa3c40aaihyI38qwf1E93F4qNImHtyxbqwUVc0EAFqE+wbQTtOu6Is7UTd 9VlBLRJPcjdy8vRCLp4D49xov9r8YkHGb8iLZjfZFBHHZ3090u+M4IWL7N4i/U9z/ETl9+ BnxpUuPF+7/QdXL8wDiCL2bumX3xA8s= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-270-XohdWLG2MISypBlINptBww-1; Mon, 15 May 2023 09:09:51 -0400 X-MC-Unique: XohdWLG2MISypBlINptBww-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBFD43C0F196; Mon, 15 May 2023 13:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.178]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E6E7C15BA0; Mon, 15 May 2023 13:09:50 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: MAHESH BODAPATI via Libc-alpha Cc: MAHESH BODAPATI , rajis@linux.ibm.com, Mahesh Bodapati Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc:GCC(<10) doesn't allow -mlong-double-64 after -mabi=ieeelongdouble References: <20230512102259.2329923-1-bmahi496@linux.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 15:09:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20230512102259.2329923-1-bmahi496@linux.ibm.com> (MAHESH BODAPATI via Libc-alpha's message of "Fri, 12 May 2023 05:22:59 -0500") Message-ID: <87353x91wj.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.8 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: * MAHESH BODAPATI via Libc-alpha: > From: Mahesh Bodapati > > Removed -mabi=3Dieeelongdouble on failing tests. It resolves the error. > error: =E2=80=98-mabi=3Dieeelongdouble=E2=80=99 requires =E2=80=98-mlong-= double-128=E2=80=99 I think this is only need if GCC defaults to -mabi=3Dieeelongdouble, and GCC 10 is not ready for that for different reasons? Thanks, Florian