From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: John Levon <levon@movementarian.org>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Issue with stale resolv.conf state
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:51:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874jddqbx4.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ze7KCkIzR5PuErba@movementarian.org> (John Levon's message of "Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:08:26 +0000")
* John Levon:
> I don't understand the first part of the comment, but indeed, ->resp doesn't
> match. In particular:
>
> 62 return ctx->resp->options == ctx->conf->options
>
> and ctx->resp (aka _resp) has 0x47002c1 whereas ctx->conf has 0x41002c1.
>
> I'm not sure but I suspect the additional RES_SNGLKUP|RES_SNGLKUPREOP
> may be due to this code:
>
> 1000 /* There are quite a few broken name servers out
> 1001 there which don't handle two outstanding
> 1002 requests from the same source. There are also
> 1003 broken firewall settings. If we time out after
> 1004 having received one answer switch to the mode
> 1005 where we send the second request only once we
> 1006 have received the first answer. */
> 1007 if (!single_request)
> 1008 {
> 1009 statp->options |= RES_SNGLKUP;
> 1010 single_request = true;
> 1011 *gotsomewhere = save_gotsomewhere;
> 1012 goto retry;
> 1013 }
> 1014 else if (!single_request_reopen)
> 1015 {
> 1016 statp->options |= RES_SNGLKUPREOP;
> 1017 single_request_reopen = true;
> 1018 *gotsomewhere = save_gotsomewhere;
> 1019 __res_iclose (statp, false);
> 1020 goto retry_reopen;
> 1021 }
That's a very good point. Yes, the current reloading code does not take
into account that we change _res.options dynamically based on network
behavior.
That automatic configuration change based on temporary network glitches
is problematic in other contexts as well (it may further trigger bugs in
dual query processing).
Maybe we should just remove the automatic downgrade, basically not
persist this across queries anymore.
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-11 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-11 9:08 John Levon
2024-03-11 10:51 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2024-03-12 0:51 ` Cristian Rodríguez
2024-03-12 6:45 ` Florian Weimer
2024-03-12 9:09 ` Philip Sanetra
2024-03-12 10:04 ` John Levon
2024-03-12 14:25 ` Cristian Rodríguez
2024-03-12 14:30 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874jddqbx4.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=levon@movementarian.org \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).