From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88C9A3858D3C for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 11:57:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 88C9A3858D3C Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-208-SVT6JRgWPz6F8A1j9ZFY_A-1; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 07:57:39 -0400 X-MC-Unique: SVT6JRgWPz6F8A1j9ZFY_A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 211EC86B8A0; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 11:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.193.187]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B22ED432488; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 11:57:37 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Joseph Myers Cc: Subject: Re: Why -static-libgcc? (Or: Do we need a build-time libc.so linker script?) References: <87y25dmc7k.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87v8yrycco.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 13:57:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Joseph Myers's message of "Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:58:16 +0000") Message-ID: <874k2p2sls.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, URIBL_BLACK autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 11:57:45 -0000 * Joseph Myers: > On Mon, 10 Jan 2022, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: > >> Do we really need to support building the test suite against a >> static-only GCC build? > > I don't think that's ever worked properly. Then I think not using -static-libgcc plus a check that installed objects do not depend on libgcc_s seems strictly superior than using -static-libgcc: this way, we ensure that we do not pull in libgcc bits we do not expect to have in glibc (like the unwinder). Thanks, Florian