From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-96449-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 89443 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2018 13:02:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 89426 invoked by uid 89); 16 Oct 2018 13:02:17 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,  Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com>,  "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix race in pthread_mutex_lock while promoting to PTHREAD_MUTEX_ELISION_NP [BZ #23275]
References: <f3fc33e5-aa98-f772-a1bf-c02ddf9352c7@linux.ibm.com>
	<a10e9a65-5031-fe9c-8552-3f046c351be6@redhat.com>
	<ebac7b01-c4ff-4310-d7cc-748c1499731a@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:23:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <ebac7b01-c4ff-4310-d7cc-748c1499731a@linux.ibm.com> (Stefan
	Liebler's message of "Thu, 4 Oct 2018 17:05:18 +0200")
Message-ID: <874ldm3v09.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2018-10/txt/msg00269.txt.bz2

* Stefan Liebler:

> The flag PTHREAD_MUTEX_NO_ELISION_NP is not explicitly checked before
> FORCE_ELISION is called. But only one of those two flags can be set.
> Your remaining assumption is correct.
> I've changed the comment in the three force-elision.h files. Is this
> okay?

The comment looks good to me know.  Thanks!

Florian