From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA7C53870C1B for ; Tue, 14 May 2024 09:11:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org EA7C53870C1B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org EA7C53870C1B Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1715677867; cv=none; b=B6Q/ZBtkhUjw0Ybo1iYXdZJtQiJ310sD8EsjKOtWGnZQDSEouCj70YsroKyCh8qsgFGJhB5Dou/C2Fn8arXm9SJOh0evDikfSBJlS9rlP1nQD28Vt+KADRsqZ9xk3DGEXi16ok5D8SzMyHrpqmm45JFYQbJrmL91CqGqHjkQ0sQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1715677867; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nTviMNJJOzZAxakEonBsKSJ9eB5ysX6in/fDV71j9VI=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=HRS3u2P5I5e8BTs/m/h+B1cctPKulK8mcBqcyaFe8h0wyMo57/VmP4m+2MiKKWujcQsHvI4pue5jgf9KUiqTBxV1aCHlLWsJdFSleahLYq7IYpSOm6hbU02crsbbpI72nTAP4x1pnANWB+4FGYfxJ+zRMhZJIW2Hkj6jb/k/pro= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1715677865; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wj+h96GwZkxldV0hpHBXxC2Z1l3T4VF08vzdN0I/brk=; b=arXRKjbh+D9B+KVF5HcvHG9ToX/+HBwOD9uUh5bOSVJ/Awzfq1d/OtFF2N/rlfXqOzQAVx 5rgLoJZu9xX8rTepfaE5d0DLaVd1Nm0N0vsouRPtNwFcoLp1E6FOfH6/7k52TWufrSRSOz Jg5Og7Ux2B8bRtx3KBfb5QpvDHqm7U8= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-671-2BujLFsqP_6na_z2eU6mGQ-1; Tue, 14 May 2024 05:10:59 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 2BujLFsqP_6na_z2eU6mGQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACA888009F8; Tue, 14 May 2024 09:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.18]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5A91400057; Tue, 14 May 2024 09:10:57 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: "Andrew Pinski (QUIC)" Cc: "libc-alpha@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Aarch64: Add new memset for Qualcomm's 0ryon-1 core In-Reply-To: (Andrew Pinski's message of "Tue, 14 May 2024 07:47:59 +0000") References: <20240508165924.874710-1-quic_apinski@quicinc.com> <20240508165924.874710-2-quic_apinski@quicinc.com> <87ikzhn7pg.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87le4cvo7m.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 11:10:56 +0200 Message-ID: <875xvgvjvj.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: * Andrew Pinski: > Yes I will be around to maintain these implementations though is this > a new requirement since it was not asked of the other implementations > that were added in previous years. The other implementations where approved or integrated by the aarch64 maintainers. This is likely not going to happen here: if we merge your changes, it will not be with their approval (but obviously also not over their objections). Thanks, Florian