From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from albireo.enyo.de (albireo.enyo.de [37.24.231.21]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C8E83858002 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:34:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 6C8E83858002 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deneb.enyo.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fw@deneb.enyo.de Received: from [172.17.203.2] (port=36093 helo=deneb.enyo.de) by albireo.enyo.de ([172.17.140.2]) with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1lQs29-00071O-3r; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:34:21 +0000 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lQs29-0001SY-14; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 15:34:21 +0200 From: Florian Weimer To: Alyssa Ross Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] stdio: fix vfscanf with matches longer than INT_MAX (bug 27650) References: <20210325140102.31043-1-hi@alyssa.is> <878s6bkuwy.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20210329120105.atdix4ryxps6iv3o@eve.qyliss.net> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 15:34:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210329120105.atdix4ryxps6iv3o@eve.qyliss.net> (Alyssa Ross's message of "Mon, 29 Mar 2021 12:01:05 +0000") Message-ID: <875z1aulr6.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:34:28 -0000 * Alyssa Ross: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 06:25:17PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Do you want to work on the test case? Will the copyright assignment >> be an obstacle? > > Okay, I've written a test case (thanks for all your help). Do I need to > seperately test swscanf and friends, since their implementation is > seperate? And should I post the revised patch with the test case as > soon as it's ready, or should I wait until I have my copyright paperwork > sorted? I think we can apply the fix now and the test case later. You can post the test case now, we can mark it as FSF Assignment Missing in Patchwork.