public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>,
	 libc-alpha@sourceware.org, hjl.tools@gmail.com,
	 carlos@systemhalted.org, Sunil Pandey <skpgkp2@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: x86: Prepare `strrchr-evex` and `strrchr-evex512` for AVX10
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2023 22:04:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cn1tcb7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fs28gug9.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (Florian Weimer's message of "Wed, 18 Oct 2023 11:18:14 +0200")

* Florian Weimer:

> * Noah Goldstein:
>
>> This commit refactors `strrchr-evex` and `strrchr-evex512` to use a
>> common implementation: `strrchr-evex-base.S`.
>>
>> The motivation is `strrchr-evex` needed to be refactored to not use
>> 64-bit masked registers in preperation for AVX10.
>>
>> Once vec-width masked register combining was removed, the EVEX and
>> EVEX512 implementations can easily be implemented in the same file
>> without any major overhead.
>>
>> The net result is performance improvements (measured on TGL) for both
>> `strrchr-evex` and `strrchr-evex512`. Although, note there are some
>> regressions in the test suite and it may be many of the cases that
>> make the total-geomean of improvement/regression across bench-strrchr
>> are cold. The point of the performance measurement is to show there
>> are no major regressions, but the primary motivation is preperation
>> for AVX10.
>>
>> Benchmarks where taken on TGL:
>> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/213799/intel-core-i711850h-processor-24m-cache-up-to-4-80-ghz/specifications.html
>>
>> EVEX geometric_mean(N=5) of all benchmarks New / Original   : 0.74
>> EVEX512 geometric_mean(N=5) of all benchmarks New / Original: 0.87
>>
>> Full check passes on x86.
>
> I believe this caused some sort of regression because when we upgraded
> glibc in the Fedora rawhide buildroot, a lot of things started failing:
>
>   glibc-2.38.9000-13.fc40 broke rawhide buildroot on x86_64
>   <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244688>
>
> The list of changes relative to the previous version is rather short:
>
> - stdlib: fix grouping verification with multi-byte thousands separator (bug 30964)
> - build-many-glibcs: Check for required system tools
> - x86: Prepare `strrchr-evex` and `strrchr-evex512` for AVX10
> - aarch64: Optimise vecmath logs
> - aarch64: Cosmetic change in SVE exp routines
> - aarch64: Optimize SVE cos & cosf
> - aarch64: Improve vecmath sin routines
> - nss: Get rid of alloca usage in makedb's write_output.
> - debug: Add regression tests for BZ 30932
> - Fix FORTIFY_SOURCE false positive
> - nss: Rearrange and sort Makefile variables
> - inet: Rearrange and sort Makefile variables
> - Fix off-by-one OOB write in iconv/tst-iconv-mt
>
> And this patch is the most likely one to cause issues.  I will try to
> revert the patch and see if it fixes the observed issues.

We did the revert and the issues were gone.  So I think this commit is
faulty.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-01 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-21 14:38 Noah Goldstein
2023-09-21 14:39 ` Noah Goldstein
2023-09-21 15:16   ` H.J. Lu
2023-09-21 19:19     ` Noah Goldstein
2023-10-04 18:48 ` Noah Goldstein
2023-10-04 19:00   ` Sunil Pandey
2023-10-18  9:18   ` Florian Weimer
2023-11-01 21:04     ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2023-11-01 21:11       ` Noah Goldstein
2023-11-01 21:22         ` Noah Goldstein
2023-11-01 22:17           ` Noah Goldstein
2023-11-02  6:44           ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877cn1tcb7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de \
    --to=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
    --cc=carlos@systemhalted.org \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=goldstein.w.n@gmail.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=skpgkp2@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).