From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=89Le=ER=gentoo.org=sam@sourceware.org>
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66093857C43
	for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Fri,  1 Sep 2023 09:04:20 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E66093857C43
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org
References: <b84ea4a5-651a-1a4c-06c8-e9ade4b7d702@redhat.com>
 <orsf805tyf.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org>
 <cc4f81c9-29b7-76af-b188-a6db4f32bcb@codesourcery.com>
 <15af1715-3530-7c29-7595-5abe48c18e8b@cs.ucla.edu>
 <87ledqe8ej.fsf@gentoo.org> <87fs3yp91h.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
User-agent: mu4e 1.10.6; emacs 30.0.50
From: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Mark
 Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>, Maxim
 Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@linaro.org>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [Action Required] glibc decision to use CTI services.
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2023 10:02:23 +0100
Organization: Gentoo
In-reply-to: <87fs3yp91h.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <877cpae033.fsf@gentoo.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>


Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org> writes:

> * Sam James via Libc-alpha:
>
>> As far as I've seen, the sourceware overseers handle requests
>> promptly. Is there something we've asked them to do which they've
>> been unable to fulfill?
>
> Removing the From: header rewriting from the mailing lists, including
> libc-alpha.  With the current list configuration, =E2=80=9Cgit am=E2=80=
=9D often does
> not produce correct results.

Have we communicated that to the overseers though (that it's so serious
it's worth moving services over)? Obviously there's https://sourceware.org/=
bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29713
already from you, but that's not the same as "this is a showstopper".

I wasn't aware this was a serious blocker given b2 helps collect the
Reviewed-bys anyway. But I can understand it being a pain for some
people's workflows.

thanks,
sam