From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A58A3858409 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:49:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 9A58A3858409 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1678466973; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5o0DRKSe7BbTY+8BGLEZr9etZTECTEK9ouSTj/+pSVk=; b=EYz/jE3IrZVvslZO45JGmbBAQvzLCC2Mbsw9mbRbKJ3MwuqrJ4zwFDo0BiQmfCDzGQtiJn 9CRjnO4jhLxGinKzb0JK2wekvbudz9Zo77xnly0FFde0fjXKIDYLClvD5ZuYmjCX86kDa8 NgBfzdJK25dBDRgyWAjWPq8TLkIauGQ= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-508-BkuWIiyaNsub2yQ3ENnAeA-1; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:49:32 -0500 X-MC-Unique: BkuWIiyaNsub2yQ3ENnAeA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D6D4857A8E; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.2.16.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80CEA492B04; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 16:49:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Adhemerval Zanella Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, "Andreas K . Huettel" , Paul Eggert Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] support: Add xreallocarray References: <20230302145732.2293756-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <20230302145732.2293756-3-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 17:49:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20230302145732.2293756-3-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> (Adhemerval Zanella's message of "Thu, 2 Mar 2023 11:57:31 -0300") Message-ID: <877cvoa6w7.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: * Adhemerval Zanella: > +void * > +xreallocarray (void *p, size_t n, size_t s) > +{ > + void *r = reallocarray (p, n, s); > + if (r == NULL) > + oom_error ("reallocarray", n); > + return r; > +} Isn't the failure condition more complicated? See xrealloc. Thanks, Florian