public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix nss/tst-nss-files-hosts-long on single-stack hosts (bug 24816)
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:54:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877d26e0wo.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YyGh8kenCFaO1RnX@fedora> (Carlos O'Donell's message of "Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:42:10 -0400")

* Carlos O'Donell:

> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote:
>> Our Fedora builders started running the container tests (after the
>> switch to systemd-nspawn), and we encountered this test failure as well.
>> Fix this by disabling address configuration in the getent tool.
>
> Two things I'd like to discuss.
>
> (1) Change the getent default and drop AI_ADDRCONFIG.
>
> I'm hesitant to add a new option to getent as a solution to a testing
> problem. The documented description for getent ahosts talks only
> about enumerating the host entries or calling getaddrinfo with
> AF_UNSPEC. Could we just change the default and ignore the host
> configuration? This is less conservative but logically it seems to me
> that we could just drop AI_ADDRCONFIG, and add a --addrconfig option to
> get back the old behaviour. What could we possibly break?

I'm not sure why we would make such a backwards-incompatible change just
to fix a test.  It sounds even more preposterous than adding the new
option.

There have been support cases where the --no-addrconfig option would
have been useful.  Today, getent isn't a great tool for diagnosing DNS
issues, and I think this option improves the situation slightly.

> (2) Fix the test.
>
> Alternatively the test should be checking to see if it is in a dual
> stack environment or single stack environment and only call getent for
> the specific case when such interfaces are enabled.
>
> Can we resolve this entirely in tst-nss-files-hosts-long?

I think it's futile to try to replicate the AI_ADDRCONFIG behavior in
the test.

Thanks,
Florian


  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-14  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-13 14:35 Florian Weimer
2022-09-13 14:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] nss: Implement --no-addrconfig option for getent Florian Weimer
2022-09-14 22:34   ` Carlos O'Donell
2022-09-15 12:11     ` Florian Weimer
2022-09-13 14:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] nss: Fix tst-nss-files-hosts-long on single-stack hosts (bug 24816) Florian Weimer
2022-09-14 22:35   ` Carlos O'Donell
2022-09-14  9:42 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix nss/tst-nss-files-hosts-long " Carlos O'Donell
2022-09-14  9:54   ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2022-09-14 22:26     ` Carlos O'Donell
2022-09-15 12:37       ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877d26e0wo.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).