From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B1173836031 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:18:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 4B1173836031 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nefkom.net Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4G8K691KfDz1s3pb; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 10:18:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4G8K6913PZz1qqkQ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 10:18:25 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0hIMnQuenaPj; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 10:18:24 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: rHy7J+kwLKDO+N9i2NWKd80pnps4JSmdauJCetuc1JqAb/+GfC82FON6fmo23J7v Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-162-121.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.162.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 10:18:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D4FE52C3615; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 10:18:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha Cc: Mark Olesen , Florian Weimer Subject: Re: readdir and ENOENT error or EOF? References: <87h7hx6kaz.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87y2b2e3n1.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> X-Yow: I am a jelly donut. I am a jelly donut. Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 10:18:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y2b2e3n1.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha's message of "Tue, 22 Jun 2021 09:53:54 +0200") Message-ID: <877dimmhww.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:18:28 -0000 On Jun 22 2021, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: > * Mark Olesen: > >> Should ENOENT be handled as an error or is it indeed an EOF condition? > > I don't know. It's really hard to make such changes because there are > so many Linux file system implementations. So we kind of default to > make not making changes. 8-/ POSIX makes it clear that when an EOF condition occurs, errno must be left unchanged. AFAICS, our readdir implementation conforms to that. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."