From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-89354-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 127503 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2018 14:11:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 127472 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jan 2018 14:11:13 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:847, H*r:PST, H*r:0800
X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com
From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
CC: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, GNU C Library
	<libc-alpha@sourceware.org>, <bug-hurd@gnu.org>, Samuel Thibault
	<samuel.thibault@gnu.org>, David Michael <fedora.dm0@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Upstreaming the glibc Hurd port
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801191304160.20421@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <20180118124537.yampmyfjsbi6wvia@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801181337150.2753@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20180118135758.xqla2yevcrjjk7si@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <87mv1btffy.fsf@hertz.schwinge.homeip.net> <20180118151446.zqlmpbmgg4kvs2y3@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801181524100.13023@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20180118154251.ynfyugkmog7kujom@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801181642310.16200@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20180118165923.ymreisuzexxz4gt3@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801182304260.26137@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20180118235924.r4z4ppvj7xlvmmfp@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801190030000.26137@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <87a7xaupjx.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801191304160.20421@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9-125-g4686d11 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 14:11:00 -0000
Message-ID: <877eseuefd.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SW-Source: 2018-01/txt/msg00658.txt.bz2

Hi!

On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 13:08:01 +0000, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> =
wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > [build-many-glibcs.py]

> Do you have advice on versions to use of mig / gnumach / hurd?
>=20
> Currently, build-many-glibcs.py uses (by default) release versions of mos=
t=20
> components other than glibc itself, release branches for gcc / binutils.=
=20=20
> Should the most recent releases from ftp.gnu.org of mig / gnumach / hurd=
=20
> be used for building current glibc for Hurd, or is it preferable or=20
> necessary to use newer development versions of those components?

The current releases should generally be fine, yes.

(This reminds me that I wanted to publish new GNU Mach, MIG, Hurd,
libpthread releases, but no need for you to wait for these, as far as I
know.)


Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe
 Thomas