From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: glibc 2.34 - Hard ABI freeze effective immediately.
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:00:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8786a45d-c80d-0a28-1885-c2c7c28efa4a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4dc802d0-2660-d851-330d-6c8e56b08c88@linaro.org>
On 7/23/21 9:13 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
>
> On 23/07/2021 02:13, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On 7/22/21 9:24 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>>> Do we still have time for the posix_spawnattr_tcsetpgrp_np [1]? I think the
>>> code should be simple enough.
>>>
>>> [1] https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/patch/20210617175751.1619846-2-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org/
>> No, I do not think we have enough time, or to be more precise I want
>> to review the use case, ask Godmar to verify that API does what is
>> required, and *then* include it in the release.
>
> Fair enough.
>
>>
>> I want to use the remaining 6 days to fix bugs without any further
>> ABI work.
>>
>> I would like to see:
>> - LD_AUDIT bugs fixed.
>> - pthread condvar bugs fixed.
>> - C.UTF-8 added as supported (resolved Florian's last comment about U+FFFD usage).
>>
>
> I would like to add some extra time64 tests changes [1]. They do not touch
> the code, besides libsupport.
>
> [1] https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=2510
Absolutely, we should review this and merge it.
I see the 32-bit builder failed this series:
NONE -> FAIL : socket/tst-socket-timestamp
NONE -> FAIL : socket/tst-socket-timestamp-time64
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-26 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-05 2:43 glibc 2.34 - Slushy " Carlos O'Donell
2021-07-19 2:15 ` glibc 2.34 - Hard ABI " Carlos O'Donell
2021-07-19 13:51 ` Florian Weimer
2021-07-19 14:13 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-07-19 14:30 ` Florian Weimer
2021-07-22 12:28 ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-07-22 13:02 ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-07-22 17:56 ` Florian Weimer
2021-07-22 12:31 ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-07-22 13:24 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-07-23 5:13 ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-07-23 5:53 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-26 14:22 ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-07-26 14:28 ` Samuel Thibault
2021-07-26 14:37 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-26 14:45 ` Samuel Thibault
2021-07-23 13:13 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-07-26 13:00 ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2021-07-26 13:13 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-07-26 18:31 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-07-22 13:51 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-07-25 19:46 ` H.J. Lu
2021-07-25 21:54 ` Florian Weimer
2021-07-25 22:07 ` H.J. Lu
2021-07-25 22:14 ` Florian Weimer
2021-07-26 7:19 ` Andreas Schwab
2021-07-26 14:29 ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-07-26 14:32 ` H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8786a45d-c80d-0a28-1885-c2c7c28efa4a@redhat.com \
--to=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=siddhesh@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).