From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 905DD3858D39 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 20:57:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 905DD3858D39 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nefkom.net Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4JBKq41LzMz1qwdZ; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:57:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4JBKq411B2z1qqkB; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:57:52 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UTL3Od20tXFT; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:57:51 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: 3GoXYKCSaQmpCZdCiSWenZrfV4ALdsDv3miG0zWraWAqpoQSZZhze0Ey46fpBA8C Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-165-4.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.165.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:57:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E869F2C3A38; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:57:50 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Rich Felker Cc: Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha , Florian Weimer Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] linux: Use 'long int' for timespec tv_nsec on x32 (BZ #16437) References: <20211210110233.1401640-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <87mtl879ch.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <20211211000844.GB7074@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <87bl1n2cyp.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87fsqzeyl3.fsf@igel.home> <20211211203307.GD7074@brightrain.aerifal.cx> X-Yow: HOW could a GLASS be YELLING?? Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:57:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20211211203307.GD7074@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (Rich Felker's message of "Sat, 11 Dec 2021 15:33:07 -0500") Message-ID: <878rwqg8q9.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 20:57:57 -0000 On Dez 11 2021, Rich Felker wrote: > Still, the issue can only happen if the pair of consumers was compiled > with different versions of the headers. Which can happen quite easily, if the producer is recompiled after the libc upgrade, while the consumer remains unchanged. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."