From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org, sguelton@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove __warn_memset_zero_len [bz #25399]
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 10:56:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878sbh4f90.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eab90cae-20c8-1cbf-0203-239eb5b006a2@sourceware.org> (Siddhesh Poyarekar's message of "Wed, 4 Nov 2020 15:22:37 +0530")
* Siddhesh Poyarekar:
> On 11/4/20 3:10 PM, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote:
>> * Jakub Jelinek:
>>
>>> It is ok if it doesn't warn anymore, and it is ok if it is not in the
>>> headers anymore, but one can still have object files or *.a libraries
>>> compiled with gcc 4.9 and earlier against older glibc and that will
>>> now fail to link altogether.
>> In general, that is not supported. We have recently made an
>> exception
>> for __xstat. But in this case, linking after removal will only fail if
>> there was an annoying linker warning before, so I think it's going to be
>> very rare that this makes a difference.
>
> I suppose another way to look at this is that the patch does not fix
> the link failure, it only ensures that the symbol doesn't appear in
> the future by accident.
>
> We can then look at fixing the link failure by adding the symbol in if
> someone actually cares enough to file another bug. Does that sound
> reasonable?
Eh, right. The __warn_memset_zero_len symbol is currently not part of
libc_nonshared.a. (Our downstream build of 2.17 still has it, but the
one based on 2.28 does not, due to a different GCC version being used.)
So there is no new backwards compatibility impact from remove the
__warndecl stuff.
Thanks,
Florian
--
Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-04 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-04 9:05 Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-04 9:19 ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-04 9:36 ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-11-04 9:40 ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-04 9:52 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-04 9:56 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2020-11-05 4:35 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878sbh4f90.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=sguelton@redhat.com \
--cc=siddhesh@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).