From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
Cc: jeremy.linton@arm.com, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64: update NEWS about branch protection
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:04:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878sf2r60p.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200729091734.GT7127@arm.com> (Szabolcs Nagy's message of "Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:17:34 +0100")
* Szabolcs Nagy:
>> Are there any ELF notes I should watch out for?
>
> readelf should show
>
> GNU 0x00000010 NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 Properties: AArch64 feature: BTI
>
> (PAC may be missing in some libgcc asm, that's
> fixed up in gcc-trunk, but it's harmless.)
Thanks. It looks like with the flags in CFLAGS, the notes are indeed
there in some cases, because RPM debugedit chokes on them:
explicitly decompress any DWARF compressed ELF sections in /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/glibc-2.31.9000-23.fc33.aarch64/usr/bin/gencat
extracting debug info from /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/glibc-2.31.9000-23.fc33.aarch64/usr/bin/gencat
Failed to update file: invalid section entry size
I'll try to figure out what is going on there. It's a bit suspicious
that this is the first dynamically linked binary, so maybe the notes are
missing from the shared objects and statically linked binaries still.
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-29 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-29 8:08 Szabolcs Nagy
2020-07-29 8:11 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-29 8:49 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-07-29 9:01 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-29 9:17 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-07-29 10:04 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2020-07-29 10:25 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-07-29 12:51 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-31 6:58 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-07-31 13:22 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-08-03 18:53 ` Carlos O'Donell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878sf2r60p.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=law@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).