From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 551A33858D3C for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:46:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 551A33858D3C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 551A33858D3C Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713347188; cv=none; b=LiLoJa9CaPfmOxPnCOKFQ/1nZhJ4kbfkbTTFUVNLoNj9KG1w2xvf58aCncgVLgL4Cmyp0q0UpWcD2MB6Rsw0go8sFkLVQXGlxxrhOboCOQ90IvMx/10P5ulrta6WVbmCN8jhMfwJtzyaJEg7woYigAEjNUXQA8MlBe0kMAWzY9U= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713347188; c=relaxed/simple; bh=N6aBx/awOVp6ECpY05khnZtW2iSIs3VmIckkc5NE9VE=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=SRM1RT5p15yXdhYfc17lZ9V3BMbpsdiss3CAOYCdoZv7jpuPW8oSn35czDGb6RLvkR0A3R2LCIkcDTK6ryNzz6j7kd3tTRctJlainCewJRlnbRn2wZhe+//UBHYrRHOJMJ1bT8rWbG7EjPrJ/1CkCdCxicbgQWdFf1MJAEVXbo8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1713347185; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=N6aBx/awOVp6ECpY05khnZtW2iSIs3VmIckkc5NE9VE=; b=Hu/a68a/TI31RasCIszPMsYetfe6toTMcmr/DEjoAoDlpewAE3dKlt2j33g/iwt8OAqNJB eFroA2Xsr3UbOHohKmvcb41ia7jb6CqD3bsePSeyBtrvJ0tIsWxggVUXNV8+epuiRr3/82 ynbUquVFc8U8CKK+Tr2cAFpRpW53Ksg= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-678-BIDHY3nlO4GIz_ZEvXsv6Q-1; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 05:46:24 -0400 X-MC-Unique: BIDHY3nlO4GIz_ZEvXsv6Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E5821044575; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.193.229]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67447400D279; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:46:23 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: michael.hudson@canonical.com, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] build-many-glibcs: Add a rv64gcbv-on-rv64gc/lp64d sub-variant In-Reply-To: (Palmer Dabbelt's message of "Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:12:52 -0700 (PDT)") References: Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:46:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87a5lsiap2.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.2 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: * Palmer Dabbelt: > If we can pick up some extra testing burden now as a way to reduce > fragmentation then it's probably a win in the long run, even if we > have to go through a few generations of this before things calm down. > If you're planning on moving to something completely different, > though, then maybe it's not worth the extra builds. A run-time tester integrated with patchwork might be useful, assuming it's stable and produces clean results for the current tree. Thanks, Florian