From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25CC13858D37 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:25:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 25CC13858D37 Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-349-y7yvOkoYM56U7OR_3-a0ag-1; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 13:25:40 -0400 X-MC-Unique: y7yvOkoYM56U7OR_3-a0ag-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 117141C0E0FD; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:25:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.193.187]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C182554A1E; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:25:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Joseph Myers Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Siddhesh Poyarekar Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] scripts: Add glibcelf.py module References: <87levyt8ny.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87h76lrs4g.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 19:25:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87h76lrs4g.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (Florian Weimer's message of "Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:37:51 +0200") Message-ID: <87a6cdrpwu.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:25:43 -0000 * Florian Weimer: > * Joseph Myers: > >> On Thu, 21 Apr 2022, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: >> >>> +class _OpenIntEnum(enum.IntEnum): >>> + """Integer enumeration that supports arbitrary int values.""" >>> + @classmethod >>> + def _missing_(cls, value): >>> + # See enum.IntFlag._create_pseudo_member_. This allows >>> + # creating of enum constants with arbitrary integer values. >>> + pseudo_member = int.__new__(cls, value) >>> + pseudo_member._name_ = None >>> + pseudo_member._value_ = value >>> + return pseudo_member >> >> This appears to depend on Python 3.6 or later, 3.5 produces: >> >> ValueError: _names_ are reserved for future Enum use > > Thanks for tracking down the regression. I hope to have a workaround > soon. Ugh. enum.IntFlag is missing as well in Python 3.5 Can we require at least Python 3.6 for testing? Otherwise I will mark these new tests as UNSUPPORTED. Thanks, Florian