From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EC83857C54 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:28:39 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 62EC83857C54 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-88-F8bcOMi8MDOicXEKi266UQ-1; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 07:28:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: F8bcOMi8MDOicXEKi266UQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08B9A6415A; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (ovpn-114-108.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.108]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C92227CB7; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:28:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Stefan Liebler Cc: "Lucas A. M. Magalhaes" , Stefan Liebler via Libc-alpha Subject: Re: [PATCH] Loosen the limits of time/tst-cpuclock1. References: <20200828085852.1861153-1-stli@linux.ibm.com> <87d03brm12.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <159887863153.2808979.8243416548539150947@localhost.localdomain> <87r1rnhsxx.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:28:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Liebler's message of "Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:10:29 +0200") Message-ID: <87blhz4bds.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:28:40 -0000 * Stefan Liebler: > How do we want to proceed here: > - Shall we just loosen the limits? > - Shall we remove the whole test? > - Shall we remove only the first check which compares nanosleep vs > clock_gettime (child_clock, before|after)? I lean towards removing both time/tst-cpuclock1 and time/tst-cpuclock2. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill