From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 100109 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2018 13:15:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 100077 invoked by uid 89); 26 Nov 2018 13:15:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com From: Florian Weimer To: Joseph Myers Cc: Subject: Re: Fix Arm __ASSUME_COPY_FILE_RANGE (bug 23915) [committed] References: Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 13:15:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Joseph Myers's message of "Fri, 23 Nov 2018 17:54:26 +0000") Message-ID: <87bm6cou8a.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SW-Source: 2018-11/txt/msg00654.txt.bz2 * Joseph Myers: > 2018-11-23 Joseph Myers > > [BZ #23915] > * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/kernel-features.h > [__LINUX_KERNEL_VERSION < 0x040700] (__ASSUME_COPY_FILE_RANGE): > Undefine. So I feel kind of bad about this=E2=80=94I looked for such issues after the first problems cropped up and just didn't seem them in the kernel source tree. Assuming that I'm going to implement a few system call wrappers in the future, how can I do a better job here? Thanks, Florian