From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-94891-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 90664 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2018 01:34:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 90654 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2018 01:34:30 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=2300, UD:br, H*F:D*br
X-HELO: pdx1-sub0-mail-a16.g.dreamhost.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=ascii.art.br; h=from:to:cc
	:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version
	:content-type; s=ascii.art.br; bh=MLygUTFVLobEuOc5Q+JfuCs8+N8=; b=
	H+W3CTYN66Z7VP56uk0mG/4vQMODjow8uVHPGjJipb6Oirz0NeBeiiqEc8DyIhOt
	p0vgFrJGW1KGAIowQmrXLD412ml5SBxnK3Cff+PkmnkQW6N3gsgSWoKomgfsGmkR
	frpAm++MzUoOJxmFt4zxO39HyUqq38+kP5gL6P66gAw=
From: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom@ascii.art.br>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: glibc 2.28 status --- Most recent gcc and binutils used?
In-Reply-To: <6f693374-fdb5-049d-6198-a2f8f99d5a47@redhat.com>
References: <6f693374-fdb5-049d-6198-a2f8f99d5a47@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.27 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.3.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 01:34:00 -0000
Message-ID: <87bmasi1nl.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2018-07/txt/msg01006.txt.bz2

Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> writes:

> If you have used a version of these tools that is newer than on this
> list, please tell me which version, and if your build worked, such
> that I can update the expected versions to work list.

I've also tested with:

> General:
> * gmake 4.0

gmake 4.2.1

> * gcc (no specific newest tested version listed)

gcc 8.1

> * binutils 2.29.1

Binutils 2.30.0

> * gawk 4.2.0

gawk 4.2.1

> Pretty printers:
> * python 2.7.6, or 3.4.3

Python 3.6.5

> * PExpect 4.0

PExpect 4.5.0

> * gdb 7.8

GDB 8.1

-- 
Tulio Magno