From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>,
Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>,
Richard Biener <rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>,
Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 2/2] Makeconfig: Compile glibc with -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 14:43:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cz0xb8qr.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2307121052350.4723@jbgna.fhfr.qr> (Richard Biener's message of "Wed, 12 Jul 2023 10:56:17 +0000 (UTC)")
* Richard Biener:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2023, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
>> Don't undefine __nonnull to prevent compiler optimizations. Instead,
>> tell the compiler to not optimize based on the attribute, via the
>> appropriate flag.
>
> I'll note that using -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks doesn't work
> (anymore?) to preserve the nullptr check in
>
> int __attribute__((nonnull)) foo (int *p)
> {
> if (p)
> return *p;
> return 0;
> }
>
> so the documentation of 'nonnull' which says
>
> @item The compiler may also perform optimizations based on the
> knowledge that certain function arguments cannot be null. These
> optimizations can be disabled by the
> @option{-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks} option. @xref{Optimize Options}.
>
> isn't accurate.
That's the paragraph about function calls, not function definitions.
The above is a function definition. So it's not a counterexample. The
second paragraph says that the optimization behavior you see is
currently not controllable by an option.
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-12 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-11 13:11 [RFC v1 0/2] Use -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks to build glibc Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-11 13:11 ` [RFC v1 1/2] Makeconfig: Use one line per token Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-11 18:05 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-07-11 13:11 ` [RFC v1 2/2] Makeconfig: Compile glibc with -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-11 13:41 ` Florian Weimer
2023-07-11 13:53 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-07-12 10:56 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-12 12:22 ` Cristian Rodríguez
2023-07-12 12:43 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2023-07-11 13:18 ` [RFC v1 0/2] Use -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks to build glibc Florian Weimer
2023-07-11 13:19 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-11 13:22 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-07-11 13:24 ` Alejandro Colomar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cz0xb8qr.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=apinski@marvell.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=rguenth@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=sam@gentoo.org \
--cc=xry111@xry111.site \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).