From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2460385780D for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 19:14:47 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org B2460385780D Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-518-XKiQf40qPf6CiFPvZ6F7Zw-1; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:14:45 -0400 X-MC-Unique: XKiQf40qPf6CiFPvZ6F7Zw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5186107ACCD; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 19:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (ovpn-112-80.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.80]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D95295D6D5; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 19:14:43 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Adhemerval Zanella Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] Transparent multi-version symbol support References: Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 20:14:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Adhemerval Zanella's message of "Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:02:35 -0300") Message-ID: <87czvvj6q9.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 19:14:48 -0000 * Adhemerval Zanella: > The only detail I am not sure is if SYMVER_NEEDS_ALIAS does yields any > substantial gain (and it require some refactoring and code to handle it). > What kind of improvement do you expect? I think it's desirable not to pollute the symbol table if we can avoid it because debuggers occasionally show the aliases instead of the main symbol. Thanks, Florian