From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 789583857815; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 23:23:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 789583857815 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=whitebox@nefkom.net Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6PNm3Bslz1qs3k; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 00:23:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6PNm2JFJz1qr42; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 00:23:52 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EIX2T38xIA2P; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 00:23:51 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: DSXEw92cuRElix6exKUjHA+TJ+776PDi6MY51/Qy09djS8nj3OzEyast9lJ4te/J Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-185-54.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.185.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 00:23:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E94D22C362E; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 00:23:50 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Joseph Myers Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar , fweimer@redhat.com, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86 long double: Consider pseudo numbers as signaling References: <20201224024554.3579622-1-siddhesh@sourceware.org> <20201224024554.3579622-2-siddhesh@sourceware.org> X-Yow: I am having FUN... I wonder if it's NET FUN or GROSS FUN? Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2021 00:23:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Joseph Myers's message of "Thu, 31 Dec 2020 22:58:13 +0000") Message-ID: <87czypzhix.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 23:23:55 -0000 On Dez 31 2020, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, Siddhesh Poyarekar via Libc-alpha wrote: > >> diff --git a/sysdeps/generic/nan-pseudo-number.h b/sysdeps/generic/nan-pseudo-number.h > > I don't think this belongs in sysdeps/generic/. The "pseudo-number" > concept is specific to the ldbl-96 format; a "generic" header is really > something specific to ldbl-96 and so should go in sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-96/ > instead. (x86 and m68k have different rules regarding what encodings are > valid. m68k doesn't have the concept of pseudo-nan and pseudo-inf, as it treats the explicit integer bit in those formats as don't-care. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."