From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=4e9/=7M=deneb.enyo.de=fw@sourceware.org>
Received: from albireo.enyo.de (albireo.enyo.de [37.24.231.21])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7736C3858C53
	for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 06:30:18 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 7736C3858C53
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deneb.enyo.de
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=deneb.enyo.de
Received: from [172.17.203.2] (port=33497 helo=deneb.enyo.de)
	by albireo.enyo.de ([172.17.140.2]) with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
	id 1pe927-007Ghv-Ts; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 06:30:15 +0000
Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <fw@deneb.enyo.de>)
	id 1pe927-0004Oh-KH; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 07:30:15 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
Cc: bug-hurd@gnu.org,  libc-alpha@sourceware.org,  Samuel Thibault
 <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hurd: Add expected abilist files for x86_64
References: <871qlkmxbt.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
	<20230319201447.722965-1-bugaevc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 07:30:15 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20230319201447.722965-1-bugaevc@gmail.com> (Sergey Bugaev's
	message of "Sun, 19 Mar 2023 23:14:47 +0300")
Message-ID: <87edpk6iko.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>

* Sergey Bugaev:

> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 9:05 PM Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
>> You should consider creating a shlib-versions file with a baseline of
>> 2.38, so that the obsolete Sun RPC symbols (and many others) are not
>> compiled in.
>
> So *that's* how it's done! Thank you.
>
> Does the below look reasonable? I've dropped lib{mach,hurd}user,

Based on a quick check, it looks okay.  Obviously we would like to get
rid of more legacy symbols (particularly in libio), but that work
hasn't been done yet (it's not Hurd-specific).

>  and it seems libanl, libnsl, libutil are all gone.

Yes, that's expected.