From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EADA3858402 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 14:43:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1EADA3858402 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-321-vSpbd3inPaWCjssSzSUyOw-1; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:43:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: vSpbd3inPaWCjssSzSUyOw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74B06802937; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 14:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.194.140]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F7395D9FC; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 14:43:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Adhemerval Zanella Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/19] nptl: Use tidlock when accessing TID on pthread_sigqueue References: <20210823195047.543237-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <20210823195047.543237-18-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:43:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210823195047.543237-18-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> (Adhemerval Zanella's message of "Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:50:45 -0300") Message-ID: <87eeag5ksb.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 14:43:23 -0000 * Adhemerval Zanella: > + /* Block all signal, since the lock is recursive and used on pthread_cancel > + (which should be async-signal-safe). */ > + sigset_t oldmask; > + __libc_signal_block_all (&oldmask); > + lll_lock (pd->tidlock, LLL_PRIVATE); > + > + int res; > + if (pd->tid == 0) > + { > + pid_t pid = getpid (); Huh, that can't be right, should be pd->tid != 0. Don't we have test coverage for this? > + else > + res = -ESRCH; We can return 0 in this case, I think. It's possibly that the same issue regarding synchronous signal delivery for pthread_jill applies here. Thanks, Florian