From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A9F3851C09 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:47:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 53A9F3851C09 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-221-6k_-FgFqO1ubPJeJeU-b4Q-1; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 07:47:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 6k_-FgFqO1ubPJeJeU-b4Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E881084C98; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (ovpn-114-84.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.84]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 814B319C66; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:47:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Alejandro Colomar , linux-man@vger.kernel.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] system_data_types.7: Add '__int128' References: <20201001163443.106933-1-colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com> <20201001163443.106933-2-colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 13:47:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20201001163443.106933-2-colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com> (Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha's message of "Thu, 1 Oct 2020 18:34:41 +0200") Message-ID: <87eemg97ew.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 11:47:11 -0000 * Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha: > +the compiler is able to generate efficient code for 128-bit arithmetic". Stray "? > +.PP > +See also the > +.IR intmax_t , > +.IR int N _t I think it's surprising that intmax_t can be smaller than __int128 (and usually is, I think), so that's probably worth mentioning. Assuming that we want to document __int128 at all as part of the man-pages project. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill