From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20018 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2018 21:09:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19980 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jun 2018 21:09:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com From: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] Move declare_mgen_finite_alias definition In-Reply-To: References: <20180620020426.20372-1-tuliom@linux.ibm.com> <20180620020426.20372-3-tuliom@linux.ibm.com> <87k1qtbnx9.fsf@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.25 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.3.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 21:09:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18062021-2213-0000-0000-000002BCD7FA X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009229; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000265; SDB=6.01049879; UDB=6.00537992; IPR=6.00828851; MB=3.00021765; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-06-20 21:09:44 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18062021-2214-0000-0000-00005A8CAA17 Message-Id: <87efh1b1wq.fsf@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-06-20_09:,, signatures=0 X-SW-Source: 2018-06/txt/msg00638.txt.bz2 Joseph Myers writes: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: > >> Joseph Myers writes: >> >> > How does this patch differ from the version I already approved? >> >> There is no difference. I re-sent it because it's part of the patch set. >> I can merge it you believe it's OK. > > Approved patches not depending on other unapproved patches should be > committed (unless the approval is specifically conditional on some other > change) to reduce the size of future patch series revisions. Ack. Pushed as badba23cacde. Thanks! -- Tulio Magno