From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-66932-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 47363 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2016 19:44:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 47335 invoked by uid 89); 8 Feb 2016 19:44:10 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*MI:mid, H*M:mid, forum
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: albireo.enyo.de
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,  GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,  Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>,  llvm-commits <llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org>,  cfe-commits <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: Linux-abi group
References: <CAMe9rOqPzub4Qr95JT9_U9FBtbME4Xb2ZTgqPrN-Umf70vWGbQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87io1z2e2i.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
	<CAMe9rOqxZ6NDTc9pKJRpA--A_+moVNSZXyvZ0mkebx0X+LD=_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:44:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOqxZ6NDTc9pKJRpA--A_+moVNSZXyvZ0mkebx0X+LD=_g@mail.gmail.com>
	(H. J. Lu's message of "Mon, 8 Feb 2016 11:34:53 -0800")
Message-ID: <87egcn2diz.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2

* H. J. Lu:

> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
>> * H. J. Lu:
>>
>>> I created a mailing list to discuss Linux specific,.processor independent
>>> modification and extension of generic System V Application Binary Interface:
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/forum/linux-abi
>>>
>>> I will start to document existing Linux extensions, like STT_GNU_IFUNC.
>>> I will propose some new extensions soon.
>>
>> Why can't you use the existing C++ ABI list?  Is there no overlap at
>> all?
>>
> :
> I wasn't referring to empty class
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-02/msg00057.html

But still there is going to be some overlap?

> I was referring to program properties:
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/generic-abi/fyIXttIsYc8

This looks more like an ELF topic to me, not really ABI.

Please discuss this on a GNU project list because it affects the
entire GNU project.

Florian